1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1979 Mazda 616

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1979 Mazda 616. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1979 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 620 kg more than 1979 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Mazda 616.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Lumina 1979 Mazda 616
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Lumina 616
Year Released 1996 1979
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 1585 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 79 HP
Torque 311 Nm 124 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.5 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 83 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 910 kg
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2480 mm