1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 760 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Lumina | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Lumina | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 3789 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2160 mm |
