1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2001 Mazda B4000

To start off, 2001 Mazda B4000 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Lumina would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda B4000 (207 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B4000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 185 kg more than 2001 Mazda B4000.

Because 2001 Mazda B4000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mazda B4000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda B4000 (324 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. (311 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda B4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Lumina.

Compare all specifications: