1996 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 2005 Mazda 3

To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Lumina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Lumina would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (200 HP) has 96 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 3. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 290 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Lumina (311 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 3. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Lumina 2005 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Lumina 3
Year Released 1996 2005
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3789 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 104 HP
Torque 311 Nm 148 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1240 kg
Vehicle Length 5110 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2650 mm