1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. (72 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace has manual transmission. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: