1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1961 Fiat Grand Break
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 95 kg more than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Fiat Grand Break. (188 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 1961 Fiat Grand Break | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Malibu | Grand Break |
Year Released | 1996 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 2279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2660 mm |