1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1962 Holden EK
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (249 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 1962 Holden EK | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Malibu | EK |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 249 Nm | 164 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
