1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 965 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (249 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Malibu | Fronte |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 249 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2060 mm |