1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (137 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 65 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Malibu 1967 Mercury Cougar
Make Chevrolet Mercury
Model Malibu Cougar
Year Released 1996 1967
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 4940 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 150 HP 137 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1465 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2830 mm