1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1980 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 275 kg more than 1980 Mazda 121.
Because 1980 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 1980 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 121 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2520 mm |