1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1983 Donkervoort S7
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Donkervoort S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Donkervoort S7 would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Because 1983 Donkervoort S7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Donkervoort S7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Donkervoort S7. (163 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Donkervoort S7.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 1983 Donkervoort S7 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Donkervoort |
Model | Malibu | S7 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 163 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1080 mm |