1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1988 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1988 Acura Integra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 1988 Acura Integra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Acura |
Model | Malibu | Integra |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2450 mm |