1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Lancia Zeta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Lancia Zeta would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (89 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Lancia Zeta. (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 1994 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lancia |
| Model | Malibu | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
