1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 4,687 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 50 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Malibu. (210 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Malibu | Durango |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 4687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2950 mm |