1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2003 Ford Taurus

To start off, 2003 Ford Taurus is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (156 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Ford Taurus. (155 HP @ 4900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Taurus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Taurus weights approximately 71 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Malibu.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Taurus. (244 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Taurus.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Malibu 2003 Ford Taurus
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Malibu Taurus
Year Released 1996 2003
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 2967 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 156 HP 155 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 244 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3950 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 78.7 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1406 kg 1477 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 3030 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 L 68 L