1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2003 Opel Signum
To start off, 2003 Opel Signum is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2003 Opel Signum. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Signum.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Signum. (167 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Signum.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 2003 Opel Signum | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Malibu | Signum |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 80.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 88.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2500 mm |