1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Westfield |
Model | Malibu | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2320 mm |