1996 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
Model | Malibu | 408 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2710 mm |