1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 535 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Monte Carlo | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 1996 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 109 L |