1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 715 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1978 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Monte Carlo | Corniche |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 2280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3030 mm |