1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (215 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 245 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (298 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Monte Carlo | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1996 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |