1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (215 HP) has 166 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 795 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (298 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
| Model | Monte Carlo | 102 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2160 mm |
