1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1984 Volvo 240

To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (215 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1984 Volvo 240. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1984 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 275 kg more than 1984 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1984 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (298 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Volvo 240. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Volvo 240. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 1984 Volvo 240 has manual transmission. 1984 Volvo 240 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: