1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1998 Honda SSM
To start off, 1998 Honda SSM is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Honda SSM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Honda SSM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (298 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Honda SSM. (286 Nm). This means 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Honda SSM. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 1998 Honda SSM has manual transmission. 1998 Honda SSM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1998 Honda SSM | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Monte Carlo | SSM |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 286 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2580 mm |