1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (215 HP) has 165 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Monte Carlo | M72 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
