1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (215 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2008 Volvo C70. (178 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo C70.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (351 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (298 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Monte Carlo | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 178 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 351 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 93.2 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |