1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2010 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 2010 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (298 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2010 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Monte Carlo | Caprice |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3350 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 344 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |