1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 975 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Karma |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1565 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 36 L |
