1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1950 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Talbot T 26 (276 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Talbot T 26 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 315 kg more than 1950 Talbot T 26.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Talbot T 26. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1950 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Talbot |
Model | Tracker | T 26 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1950 |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 4482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |