1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1953 Steyr 2000
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Steyr 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Steyr 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Steyr 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1953 Steyr 2000. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1953 Steyr 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 30 kg more than 1953 Steyr 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Steyr 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1953 Steyr 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Steyr |
| Model | Tracker | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |
