1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1955 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Studebaker Champion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Studebaker Champion (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Studebaker Champion should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Studebaker Champion weights approximately 145 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Studebaker Champion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1955 Studebaker Champion | |
Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
Model | Tracker | Champion |
Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 3032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2970 mm |