1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1958 Suzuki Light
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1958 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1958 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 690 kg more than 1958 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1958 Suzuki Light | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Tracker | Light |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 359 cc |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 34 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2010 mm |
