1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (137 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 170 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Tracker | Cougar |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |