1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1972 Seat 1500
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1972 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1972 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 70 kg more than 1972 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1972 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Tracker | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |
