1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 150 kg more than 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta (176 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1973 Alfa Romeo Alfetta | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Tracker | Alfetta |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1080 kg |
