1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1979 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 180 kg more than 1979 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1979 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Tracker | Eclat |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2490 mm |