1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1979 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 110 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1979 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Tracker | E |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2800 mm |
