1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1980 Lada S
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada S would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 230 kg more than 1980 Lada S.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lada S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1980 Lada S | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Tracker | S |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |