1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1985 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,937 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Mercury Sable weights approximately 170 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1985 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1985 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
| Model | Tracker | Sable |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2937 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
