1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1986 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Argenta (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Fiat Argenta. (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 1986 Fiat Argenta | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
| Model | Tracker | Argenta |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1583 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |
