1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2000 Honda Integra
To start off, 2000 Honda Integra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Integra (143 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 31 kg more than 2000 Honda Integra.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2000 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Tracker | Integra |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2570 mm |
