1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2003 Jeep Liberty is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Liberty (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Liberty (320 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2003 Jeep Liberty | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Tracker | Liberty |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |