1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2004 GMC Sierra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,963 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Sierra (325 HP) has 229 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1044 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Sierra (502 Nm) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
Model | Tracker | Sierra |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 5963 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 325 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 502 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2130 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3650 mm |