1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Rover 45

To start off, 2004 Rover 45 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 45 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 45 should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 95 kg more than 2004 Rover 45.

Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Rover 45. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 45. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 45.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Chevrolet Tracker 2004 Rover 45
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Tracker 45
Year Released 1996 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1589 cc 1588 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 96 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 138 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1230 kg 1135 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2630 mm