1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 811 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 GMC Safari | |
Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
Model | Tracker | Safari |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2041 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |