1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Saab 9-2x
To start off, 2005 Saab 9-2x is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,458 cc, 2005 Saab 9-2x is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9-2x (173 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9-2x should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9-2x weights approximately 163 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9-2x (225 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9-2x will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Saab 9-2x | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Tracker | 9-2x |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 225 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2530 mm |