1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Saab 9-7X
To start off, 2005 Saab 9-7X is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9-7X (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9-7X should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9-7X (372 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Saab 9-7X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. 2005 Saab 9-7X has automatic transmission and 1996 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Saab 9-7X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Saab 9-7X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Saab |
Model | Tracker | 9-7X |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 372 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2880 mm |