1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1996 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2490 mm |
