1996 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1996 Chevrolet Tracker.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Tracker | ML |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2913 mm |