1996 Chrysler Cirrus vs. 2008 Nissan Terrano
To start off, 2008 Nissan Terrano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Chrysler Cirrus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Chrysler Cirrus would be higher. At 2,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Terrano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Chrysler Cirrus (168 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Terrano. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Chrysler Cirrus should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Terrano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 396 kg more than 1996 Chrysler Cirrus.
Because 2008 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Chrysler Cirrus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Terrano (304 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Chrysler Cirrus. (230 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Terrano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Chrysler Cirrus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Chrysler Cirrus | 2008 Nissan Terrano | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | Cirrus | Terrano |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 17.9:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1434 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |
